A new law set to be enacted in San Francisco will set increasingly higher energy requirements on new construction. Large construction/development organizations can be notoriously scheming and vile in order to cut costs, so energy efficiency standards is not something that will ever get any traction as a “voluntary” measure.
I asked a super-smart engineer about possible issues with forcing a company to build to energy specifications that aren’t in their economic best interest and he said, “Building fire-escapes isn’t in their economic interest either, but we force them to do that for the greater good, and they don’t complain.”
Point being, there are a lot of reasons why, as a society, it makes sense to reduce energy demand. The main three that I can think of being:
- air pollution / global warming
- infrastructure and electric grid stress
- save mad $$ yo
Hopefully, energy code, and public sentiment, will get to the point such that, if a building were to be built with shoddy energy efficiency, it will get the same backlash as if it were built without fire exits.

Recent Comments